| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha : |
18/11/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
14/01/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
CANOZZI, M.E.A.; BORGES, J.A.R.; BARCELLOS, J.O.J. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOÃO AUGUSTO ROSSI BORGES, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.; JÚLIO OTÁVIO JARDIM BARCELLOS, Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Which factors can influence the perception of pain by veterinarians and animal scientists from Brazil? |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Veterinary Behavior, Volume 47, January 2022, Pages 59-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2021.10.003 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.jveb.2021.10.003 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history:Received 29 December 2020/Revised 29 June 2021/Accepted 2 October 2021/Available online 8 October 2021.
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2021.10.003. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
Society and animal professionals are increasingly concerned about the pain management during routine husbandry procedures in farm animals. In this paper, we aim to identify the factors that affect Brazilian veterinarians? and animal scientists? perceptions about the level of pain cattle experience during castration and horn removal. An online survey was conducted with these professionals, resulting in a sample size of 147 participants. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Chi-squares tests, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests. The results of descriptive statistics showed that the most frequently, the most and the least painful technique quoted, for castration, was scalpel, burdizzo, and immunocastration, respectively; and for horn removal, hot iron (for newborn and suckled calves) and saw/wires (for adult cattle), knife, and caustic paste, respectively. Women assessed cattle pain higher than men professionals for castration in newborn calves. Higher mean scores for the pain perception were associated to painful indicators: heart and/or respiration rate during castration in newborn and suckled calves; and defensive movements during horn removal in adult cattle. Those respondents who were more likely to perceived high level of pain also scored higher pain for (i) newborn calves when toxic agent or immunocastration were used to castrate; (ii) suckled calves dehorned/disbudded with chemical methods or dehorners; and (iii) all cattle ages when surgical methods or burdizzo were used for castration and amputation techniques or hot iron, for horn removal. Professionals that perceived higher level of pain in both painful procedures agreed more with the statements ?Farm animals are not as sensitive to pain as pets? and ?If there are no defensive movements, there is no need for pain mitigation use? than those that perceived lower level of pain. The pain estimation is subjective, but our results illustrate the importance of the management and individual/professional aspects on pain perception. Finally, our study highlights that improvement in pain perception by veterinary and animal scientists regarding castration and horn removal in cattle is required. MenosAbstract:
Society and animal professionals are increasingly concerned about the pain management during routine husbandry procedures in farm animals. In this paper, we aim to identify the factors that affect Brazilian veterinarians? and animal scientists? perceptions about the level of pain cattle experience during castration and horn removal. An online survey was conducted with these professionals, resulting in a sample size of 147 participants. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Chi-squares tests, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests. The results of descriptive statistics showed that the most frequently, the most and the least painful technique quoted, for castration, was scalpel, burdizzo, and immunocastration, respectively; and for horn removal, hot iron (for newborn and suckled calves) and saw/wires (for adult cattle), knife, and caustic paste, respectively. Women assessed cattle pain higher than men professionals for castration in newborn calves. Higher mean scores for the pain perception were associated to painful indicators: heart and/or respiration rate during castration in newborn and suckled calves; and defensive movements during horn removal in adult cattle. Those respondents who were more likely to perceived high level of pain also scored higher pain for (i) newborn calves when toxic agent or immunocastration were used to castrate; (ii) suckled calves dehorned/disbudded with chemical methods or dehorners; and (iii) all cattle ages when surgical... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Animal welfare; Attitudes; Beef; Dairy; Husbandry practices; Questionnaire. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03214naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1062528
005 2022-01-14
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.jveb.2021.10.003$2DOI
100 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A.
245 $aWhich factors can influence the perception of pain by veterinarians and animal scientists from Brazil?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history:Received 29 December 2020/Revised 29 June 2021/Accepted 2 October 2021/Available online 8 October 2021. Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2021.10.003.
520 $aAbstract: Society and animal professionals are increasingly concerned about the pain management during routine husbandry procedures in farm animals. In this paper, we aim to identify the factors that affect Brazilian veterinarians? and animal scientists? perceptions about the level of pain cattle experience during castration and horn removal. An online survey was conducted with these professionals, resulting in a sample size of 147 participants. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Chi-squares tests, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests. The results of descriptive statistics showed that the most frequently, the most and the least painful technique quoted, for castration, was scalpel, burdizzo, and immunocastration, respectively; and for horn removal, hot iron (for newborn and suckled calves) and saw/wires (for adult cattle), knife, and caustic paste, respectively. Women assessed cattle pain higher than men professionals for castration in newborn calves. Higher mean scores for the pain perception were associated to painful indicators: heart and/or respiration rate during castration in newborn and suckled calves; and defensive movements during horn removal in adult cattle. Those respondents who were more likely to perceived high level of pain also scored higher pain for (i) newborn calves when toxic agent or immunocastration were used to castrate; (ii) suckled calves dehorned/disbudded with chemical methods or dehorners; and (iii) all cattle ages when surgical methods or burdizzo were used for castration and amputation techniques or hot iron, for horn removal. Professionals that perceived higher level of pain in both painful procedures agreed more with the statements ?Farm animals are not as sensitive to pain as pets? and ?If there are no defensive movements, there is no need for pain mitigation use? than those that perceived lower level of pain. The pain estimation is subjective, but our results illustrate the importance of the management and individual/professional aspects on pain perception. Finally, our study highlights that improvement in pain perception by veterinary and animal scientists regarding castration and horn removal in cattle is required.
653 $aAnimal welfare
653 $aAttitudes
653 $aBeef
653 $aDairy
653 $aHusbandry practices
653 $aQuestionnaire
700 1 $aBORGES, J.A.R.
700 1 $aBARCELLOS, J.O.J.
773 $tJournal of Veterinary Behavior, Volume 47, January 2022, Pages 59-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2021.10.003
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
28/09/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
21/02/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autor : |
DE BARBIERI, I.; MONTOSSI, F.; BERRETTA, E.; RISSO, D.; CUADRO, R.; DIGHIERO, A.; URRESTARAZÚ, A.; NOLLA, M.; LUZARDO, S.; MEDEROS, A.; MARTINEZ, H.; ZAMIT, W.; LEVRATTO, J.; BENTANCURT, M.; GARÍN, M.; ZARZA, A.; PRESA, O. |
|
Afiliación : |
LUIS IGNACIO DE BARBIERI ETCHEBERRY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCHILE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ELBIO JOAQUIN BERRETTA CARVALLO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DIEGO FERNANDO RISSO RIET, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; WASHINGTON ROBIN CUADRO LOPEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALEJANDRO DIGHIERO FASCIOLI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; A. URRESTARAZÚ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARTIN ANDRES NOLLA LAFRANCONI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO FELIPE LUZARDO VILLAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; AMERICA ESTHER MEDEROS SILVEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; HOMERO MARTINEZ FORMOSO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; WILFREDO SHAMIL ZAMIT DUARTE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JUAN CARLOS LEVRATTO CORTES, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MAURO ANDRES BENTANCURT PONTTI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; M. GARÍN, SUL (Secretariado Uruguayo de la Lana).; A. ZARZA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; OROSILDO RODOLFO PRESA SEMPER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
XIX. Alternativas de manejo y alimentación para la producción de lanas finas y superfinas en la región de basalto. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2007 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
ln: MONTOSSI, F.; DE BARBIERI, I. (Eds). Proyecto Merino Fino del Uruguay: una visión con perspectiva histórica. Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2007. |
|
Páginas : |
p.207-225 |
|
Serie : |
(INIA Boletín de Divulgación ; 90) |
|
ISBN : |
978-9974-38-237-4 |
|
ISSN : |
1510-7396 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Palabras claves : |
LANAS FINAS; LANAS ULTRAFINAS. |
|
Thesagro : |
LANA; MERINO; MERINO FINO; PRODUCCION DE LANA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/8725/1/Bd-90-p.-207-225.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01230naa a2200421 a 4500
001 1053424
005 2018-02-21
008 2007 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978-9974-38-237-4
022 $a1510-7396
100 1 $aDE BARBIERI, I.
245 $aXIX. Alternativas de manejo y alimentación para la producción de lanas finas y superfinas en la región de basalto.
260 $c2007
300 $ap.207-225
490 $a(INIA Boletín de Divulgación ; 90)
650 $aLANA
650 $aMERINO
650 $aMERINO FINO
650 $aPRODUCCION DE LANA
653 $aLANAS FINAS
653 $aLANAS ULTRAFINAS
700 1 $aMONTOSSI, F.
700 1 $aBERRETTA, E.
700 1 $aRISSO, D.
700 1 $aCUADRO, R.
700 1 $aDIGHIERO, A.
700 1 $aURRESTARAZÚ, A.
700 1 $aNOLLA, M.
700 1 $aLUZARDO, S.
700 1 $aMEDEROS, A.
700 1 $aMARTINEZ, H.
700 1 $aZAMIT, W.
700 1 $aLEVRATTO, J.
700 1 $aBENTANCURT, M.
700 1 $aGARÍN, M.
700 1 $aZARZA, A.
700 1 $aPRESA, O.
773 $tln: MONTOSSI, F.; DE BARBIERI, I. (Eds). Proyecto Merino Fino del Uruguay: una visión con perspectiva histórica. Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2007.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
